But in 2006 a large study was conducted in Britain involving eight thousand children. So, perhaps enjoyment and engagement are key, rather than the exact notes you hear.Īlthough we tend to associate the Mozart effect with babies and small children, most of these studies were conducted on adults, whose brains are of course at a very different stage of development. One study found that listening to Schubert was just as good, and so was hearing a passage read out aloud from a Stephen King novel. In 2010 a larger meta-analysis of a greater number of studies again found a positive effect, but that other kinds of music worked just as well. Then it began to emerge that perhaps Mozart wasn’t so special after all. More research followed, and a meta-analysis of sixteen different studies confirmed that listening to music does lead to a temporary improvement in the ability to manipulate shapes mentally, but the benefits are short-lived and it doesn’t make us more intelligent. Did the complexity of music cause patterns of cortical firing in the brain similar to those associated with solving spatial puzzles? Nevertheless, people began to theorise about why it was that Mozart’s music in particular could have this effect. So it’s hardly going to bring you a lifetime of enhanced intelligence. But unfortunately, as the authors make clear at the time, this effect lasts for about fifteen minutes. For a short time the students were better at spatial tasks where they had to look at folded up pieces of paper with cuts in them and to predict how they would appear when unfolded. The students who listened to Mozart did better at tasks where they had to create shapes in their minds.
On three occasions they were given a series of mental tasks to complete, and before each task, they listened either to ten minutes of silence, ten minutes of a tape of relaxation instructions, or ten minutes of Mozart’s sonata for two pianos in D major (K448). The second surprise is that it wasn’t conducted on children at all: it was in fact conducted with those stalwarts of psychological studies – young adult students. When you look back at the original paper, the first surprise is that the authors from the University of California, Irvine are modest in their claims and don’t even use the “Mozart effect” phrase in the paper. I’ll leave the debate on the impact on milk yield to farmers, but what about the evidence that listening to Mozart makes people more intelligent? Exactly what was it was that the authors of the initial study discovered that took public imagination by storm? When Sergio Della Sala, the psychologist and author of the book Mind Myths, visited a mozzarella farm in Italy, the farmer proudly explained that the buffalos were played Mozart three times a day to help them to produce better milk. It’s not just babies and children who were deliberately exposed to Mozart’s melodies. The idea took off, with thousands of parents playing Mozart to their children, and in 1998 Zell Miller, the Governor of the state of Georgia in the US, even asked for money to be set aside in the state budget so that every newborn baby could be sent a CD of classical music. Mozart was undoubtedly a genius himself, his music is complex and there is a hope that if we listen to enough of it, a little of that intelligence might rub off on us. It is one of those ideas that feels plausible. The phrase “the Mozart effect” was coined in 1991, but it is a study described two years later in the journal Nature that sparked real media and public interest about the idea that listening to classical music somehow improves the brain. Whatever your age there are CDs and books to help you to harness the power of Mozart’s music, but when it comes to scientific evidence that it can make you more clever, the picture is more mixed. A quick internet search reveals plenty of products to assist you in the task. It’s the idea that if children or even babies listen to music composed by Mozart they will become more intelligent. You have probably heard of the Mozart effect.